This article, ‘Why can we not demonstrate the difference that Norwegian aid makes? An evaluation of the results measurement system and practice’, written by Espen Villanger, Rob Lloyd, Derek Poate & Merima Ali, assesses why the Norwegian aid administration is not able to document its results. They find that the system is not designed to provide the necessary documentation for results assessments, the staff are not trained in a way that would ensure adequate competence, the quality assurance functions are only sporadically used to promote results measurement and technical advice and support functions are not structured in a way to make them useful to staff. Moreover, among the system components that actually do promote and support evaluability, very few are used appropriately in practice. The article concludes that poor implementation of the current system, lack of leadership and staff incentives are key factors that can explain the inadequate results’ documentation. - See more at: http://www.itad.com/knowledge-products/an-evaluation-of-the-results-measurement-system-and-practice/#sthash.sQlkXUQc.dpuf
An Evaluation of the Results Measurement System and Practice -
Full Report
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19439342.2015.1096297?journalCode=rjde20
最受歡迎 30天 | Most Popular 30 days
-
http://www.chinatimes.com/ newspapers/20140810000262- 260102 李登輝反鈾發電 促思考釷 (Thorium) 取代 | Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor 陸氫經濟露曙光 - Thor...
-
Information and Knowledge Management for Climate Change (IKM4CC) Guidelines: complete set http://www.pacificclimatechange.net/document/in...
-
清理傷口 甜菜鹼效果更勝食鹽水 https://udn.com/news/story/7266/2454102 What is Betaine? Benefits, Signs of Deficiency and Food Sources https://dra...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment